In fact even some human being have records beating tigers and leopards “bare handed”. I am not discounting large bears’ sizes or strength, they have chances to win, but at much lower success rates than that of tigers. And tiger’s swipes and bites are deadly enough for any bears, 2000 pounds at most? In the same token, polar bears move slowly, because they have to conserve heat, they would over heat after fighting with a fast moving tiger. These “scientific” results are from the same lab.īut tigers kill lions easily, and the results are overwhelming. In both cases, we don’t see the agility of the tigers, but simply head on confrontation by the tigers. And it also gets killed quickly by a grizzly, because the grizzly breaks the tiger’s spine. In “Animals Face Off”, a tiger gets killed easily by a lion, because the lion has manes to protect itself. If you’ve seen how a tiger kills a buffalo/gaur, it would circumvent it to avoid its horns, try to get on its back and manage to kill it that way. I don’t think when a tiger runs into a large bear, brown or polar it would attack it head on. Tigers can kill something 5 or 6 times their own weights.Īnd tigers are agile and smart fighter. The Bengal tigers are not available in Russia. The Russians documents only the Siberian tiger facts. The Siberian tigers are also stronger than their Bengal cousins. Siberian: Siberian tigers kill Asiatic brown bears regularly. Even an elephant calf is born, will weigh about 1 ton, or 2200lbs.īengal vs. Tigers are capable of killing large preys such as Rhino, gaur, elephant, female or calf.
They kill marine mammals such as seals or whales, because these animals get very inconvenient on the ground. So, tigers are real bad arse’s when compared to lions agreed.īut bears, kodiak or polar please, lets keep the contests even shall we…polar bears predate on whales and walruses for christ sake.they are so bad arse that they make other bad arses look mamas boys…and i am not from north america.the only feline possibility is a liger.now that would be a fight polar bear vs liger. Plus, they just look a whole lot cooler than the other two.ġ, There is documentary evidence of tigers ( bengal) killing Rhinos ( indian), Gaurs ( biggest wild buffaloos in world),Asian Elephants ( smaller than african ones),and Indian Salt water crocs ( biggest in the world not the relatively smaller african variety).ģ, In central india a santuary was chosen for lion reintroduction(asiatic abt 95% of african variety in size) purely because there are no tigers in the sourrounding jungles, it was scientifically decided that in a survival situation tigers would probably predate asiatic lions as their prides are usually smaller ( 1 male and 2-3 females). So who are you gonna believe: a simulated fight or actual ones? And tigers have been known to kill crocodiles (who have thicker hides than bears) and even adult bears in the wild, given their controlled, raptor-speed attack. For example, Russian scientists have reputedly documented accounts of wounded bears whose hides had been penetrated by the lesser Siberian tiger fangs. And in-the-wild research suggests the tiger wins after rare confrontations. But Discovery used the more docile Siberian brand of tiger, not the degenerate creature of darkness that is the Bengal tiger. A recent simulated fight by the Discovery Channel favored the bear in a victory, saying the tiger couldn’t penetrate a bear’s hide. Let’s see who’s champion in the winners bracket… In fairness, lions weigh a lot less than bears, but so do tigers. The result: while lions would bravely charge at grizzlies, bears would smack them to their death using giant paws as a 200 pound club. 19 century Californians staged well-documented animal fights, including those between lions and bears. What’s more, tigers are usually larger and carry a bigger stick (ahem, their ginormous fangs). But once cruel promoters starting using Bengal tigers, the most aggressive wild feline, it was all tiger. Indeed, 1960 cage fights between lions and Siberian tigers revealed that the lion usually won. While some say it could go either way, a closer look reveals that it’s actually the tiger. Which beast would win in a tournament of mortal combat: the king of the jungle, a ferocious striped feline, or a godless marauding killing machine (aka bear)? In other words, who is the ultimate carnivore? In the spirit of the recent NCAA basketball tournament, let’s find out.įirst up: Lion versus tiger. Who would win in a fight: lion, tiger, or bear?
0 kommentar(er)
